|
A couple of years ago I wrote
an essay about the fledgling Kodak
DC20 digital camera. Given the expectations of the time, I was
thrilled with it. I still have it, and I note Kodak still offers
the model for sale though (as always) at a much lower price than
it was going for then.
Of course, the DC20 was a bugdet model then, and digital cameras
have also greatly improved since 1996. The "megapixel barrier"
and other issues, including sales volume, kept the very best image
qualities in the hands of the pros, whose bosses were shelling out
9 to 20,000 dollars for instant, film-quality digital images.
We bought ourselves a Kodak DC260
for both our birthdays and we are really jazzed. At 1.6 megapixels
(1536 x 1024) the images are absolutely jaw-dropping. I'm not quite
sure about the arithmetic, but if you assume 1,572,864 pixels spread
out over 303.3 square inches that should be 5185 dpi. If that's
apples to apples, it's twice the advertised resolution of the Nikon
coolscan slide scanners.
For the return trip home America West had to do some plane juggling
to cover our flight. They trotted out one of their 757 flagships
decked out in a pretty but wild pop-art paint scheme. Trudging from
the plane back up the concourse to curbside transportation, my ankle
started bothering me, so I stopped to rest. We could see a beautiful
panorama shot of our 757 parked at the ramp. You rarely see sights
that nice, so we took a shot of it. The photo currently graces my
PC multi-monitor setup and just the airplane spans 3/4 of both monitors.
The GIF inset below is heavily cropped and reduced in size from
424K to 14K. A link to a 154K JPEG reduction gives a better idea
of the true color, detail and scale.
America West 757 "City
of Tucson"
click thumbnail for downloadable 1536x1024
picture (154K)
The color and detail in the original (as in even indoor pictures)
is awesome. I have always had to heavily "adjust", enhance
and tweak photos from the old DC20 camera in Photoshop or one of
the bundled photo programs, but not this camera, indoors or out.
The plane alone spans over a foot of horizontal screen real estate,
the "normal" image size at this resolution, and you can
read the plane's name, "City of Tucson", plainly on the
side of the fuselage.
The DC260 comes with 8MB of removable Compact Flash Memory, a card
about one square inch in side which fits into a PCMCIA card adapter
you can buy separately for less than $20. These cards come in a
variety of sizes, to at least 30MB, and this particular "Compact"
configuration seems to be the only way to go.
It turns out there are about three different configurations of
removable memory cards: mini, compact and "smart". Only
"compact" flash memory seems to be adaptable to PCMCIA
everywhere.
We originally bought a prettier and somewhat cheaper Casio QV5000
which took wonderful pictures, but was far more cumbersome to operate.
We immediately returned it and bought the Kodak instead when we
realized the highly-touted Casio 8MB memory was not removable!
After screwing around with picture downloads, hardware timeouts
and Seattle FilmWorks digital floppies on different machines and
platforms for a couple of years, removable memory was almost as
important to me as high image quality.
The Kodak is not as compact as we'd been looking for, like the
Casio that we returned. We initially felt that Kodaks looked, well,
klunky. Given the intuitive clarity of function and parts placement
on the Kodak, we've changed our mind.
The PC card adapter fits into the PowerBook 3400 and automatically
mounts 8MB of memory onto the desktop (like any other removable
drive) in a few seconds. We just drag and drop JPG icons to the
powerbook hard drive, individually or all at once. I used no special
software at all to transfer, or to read or write to the memory card,
though TWAIN for the Mac is included if you want to import through
Photoshop or other TWAIN-compliant programs. You can erase the card
the same way, by dragging its memory contents to the trash and emptying.
For Mac, PCMCIA is the
only offloading hookup supported, though for my money it's now the
only way to fly. Oh yes, there is also IrDA support on both platforms.
PC users have additional options of USB or parallel port downloads
to the camera serial port. USB is surprisingly fast, but I was so
impressed with PCMCIA that I've ordered an external SCSI PC card
reader for the SCSI desktops.
We plan to experiment with the "normal" (640x480) and
"small" picture size options on the DC260 too. Yet with
17-18 pictures available on the 8MB card in hi-rez (and we bought
extra 10MB cards), it is easy to make the argument that if there
is even a tiny chance of getting that "once in a lifetime shot",
it costs nothing to take all your pictures in 1536x1024. If you
download to a laptop, you could go on an extended world cruise and
never worry about running out of storage.
The camera has loads of other features like burst and time lapse
photography, and audio captioning, which I don't think we'll ever
need. There is even video out to a TV. Other features, like an excellent
easy-to-see LCD to supplement the optical viewfinder, I didn't think
I'd care for but, in Kodak's case, I really appreciate. The DC260
even knows "which side is up" and orients landscape and
portrait photos correctly every time.
Kodak thought of everything.
One could argue that no one really needs all these features, but
Kodak laid it all out so logically and thoughtfully that we actually
gained a new appreciation of American design and engineering. The
documentation manuals are thorough, easy to follow, and generally
both simple enough for beginners and detailed enough for advanced
users. Even the indexing is excellent!
At its price -- under a grand in the sense that 5,279 feet is short
of a mile -- the camera expense is hard to rationalize if you can't
spread the expense out over a household and a few years' time. Given
that its published resolution exceeds that of the professional $8,995
digital Nikon, the Kodak, while surely not matching "big Nikon"
optics, gives a visually perfect picture at large magnifications.
It should be a serious player in digital photography for some years
to come.
Alex
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/nav/digital.shtml
July 26, 1998
|