|
I was captivated by the intriguing New
Yorker article "White
Like Me" (June 17, 1996, by Henry Louis Gates Jr.) If
you missed it, it's fascinating reading. The story of Anatole Broyard,
the critic who dominated the elite world of literary greats like
his friend Harold Brodkey, is worthwhile just for its insights into
one of the most excitingly chic literary circles which ever existed.
That might be true, even if one isn't looking for any special "angles"
in an article about a black man who intentionally fooled an adoring
white society for over half a century.
"White Like Me" might be required reading for any black
person wishing to "pass as white", or any gay man trying
to "pass as straight". I speak only for myself, not wanting
to put myself in the position of telling any Black American, or
even any gay American, what one needs to do with one's own life.
It doesn't logically follow that we must inevitably draw parallels
and conclusions from the experience of other communities ("they're
different; that couldn't happen to us!"), but don't you think
it's time we started doing so?
One could see in this article other parables, other infinite numbers
of "categories" into which we mark ourselves for self-exclusion.
One could do this, that is, if one wanted to, and knew where to
look. It all depends on our situation, and what we're trying to
pretend we're not hiding from.
The parallels I saw between Anatole Broyard and my own past as
a closeted gay man were striking. The psychology of "it shouldn't
make any difference" becomes pervasive, eventually obviating
the need for any kind of serious self-examination whatsoever. The
cleverer we are (and Broyard was obviously exceptionally clever
and witty), the more adept we become at self-deception, thus triumphing
over simple truth and honesty with an extended charade of veiled,
intricately layered allusion.
In the end, conventional wisdom has it that the deceptions become
the man. The truth is that neither ever become entirely comfortable
living with the other, but wear each other down, like other enemies
who prefer to live under the same roof where they can keep a watchful
eye on each other.
The irony is that, the more others become convinced we're the greatest
thing since sliced hamster, the better convinced we become that
they're all really hopelessly full of it. Thus must we be too, for
buying into it. The quiet, unarticulated agony of a lifetime of
truth-dodging, on the part of an Anatole Broyard or anyone else,
takes its toll in ways only the afflicted can see and feel -- not
just in what we are, but in what we could have become.
I don't kick myself around the block for it, and suspect Broyard
didn't either. For my own part, I'm grateful that reality and loss
of self kicked me hard in the head before I completely lost hope
of becoming whole. When is that point reached? I don't know if it's
cast in stone that it ever is. Nevertheless, I can even now imagine
Broyard wondering if there is a breakpoint at which one can no longer
stand to live with the enemy, but beyond which it is altogether
too late to contemplate moving out.
Alex Forbes
June 15, 1996
|